Week 1 — Principles & Practices

This week lays the foundation for ethics, safety, and governance in biotechnology — and we get hands-on with lab basics.
Lecture (Tues, Feb 3)
The Lecture recording will be posted here when Zoom releases it.
Recitation (Wed, Feb 4)
The Recitation recording and recitation slides will be posted here when Zoom releases it.
Lab
Visit this week’s Lab page to see Lab details.
Homework
About your Documentation
Make sure to document every step of the in-silico and lab experiments. Make sketches, screenshots, notes, drawings - anything that helps you - and others understand the experiment. Your Documentation should help you - and others - to understand the topic. Don’t be afraid to add things that don’t work. Show your failures - and how you did overcome them. Your Documentation should be a description of the amazing journey you are on!
Class Assignment
- First, describe a biological engineering application or tool you want to develop and why. This could be inspired by an idea for your HTGAA class project and/or something for which you are already doing in your research, or something you are just curious about.
- Next, describe one or more governance/policy goals related to ensuring that this application or tool contributes to an “ethical” future, like ensuring non-malfeasance (preventing harm). Break big goals down into two or more specific sub-goals. Below is one example framework (developed in the context of synthetic genomics) you can choose to use or adapt, or you can develop your own. The example was developed to consider policy goals of ensuring safety and security, alongside other goals, like promoting constructive uses, but you could propose other goals for example, those relating to equity or autonomy.
- Next, describe at least three different potential governance “actions” by considering the four aspects below (Purpose, Design, Assumptions, Risks of Failure & “Success”). Try to outline a mix of actions (e.g. a new requirement/rule, incentive, or technical strategy) pursued by different “actors” (e.g. academic researchers, companies, federal regulators, law enforcement, etc). Draw upon your existing knowledge and a little additional digging, and feel free to use analogies to other domains (e.g. 3D printing, drones, financial systems, etc.).
- Purpose: What is done now and what changes are you proposing?
- Design: What is needed to make it “work”? (including the actor(s) involved - who must opt-in, fund, approve, or implement, etc)
- Assumptions: What could you have wrong (incorrect assumptions, uncertainties)?
- Risks of Failure & “Success”: How might this fail, including any unintended consequences of the “success” of your proposed actions?
- Next, score (from 1-3 with, 1 as the best, or n/a) each of your governance actions against your rubric of policy goals. The following is one framework but feel free to make your own:
Your context:
| Does the option: | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enhance Biosecurity | |||
| • By preventing incidents | |||
| • By helping respond | |||
| Foster Lab Safety | |||
| • By preventing incident | |||
| • By helping respond | |||
| Protect the environment | |||
| • By preventing incidents | |||
| • By helping respond | |||
| Other considerations | |||
| • Minimizing costs and burdens to stakeholders | |||
| • Feasibility? | |||
| • Not impede research | |||
| • Promote constructive applications |
- Last, drawing upon this scoring, describe which governance option, or combination of options, you would prioritize, and why. Outline any trade-offs you considered as well as assumptions and uncertainties. For this, you can choose one or more relevant audiences for your recommendation, which could range from the very local (e.g. to MIT leadership or Cambridge Mayoral Office) to the national (e.g. to President Biden or the head of a Federal Agency) to the international (e.g. to the United Nations Office of the Secretary-General, or the leadership of a multinational firm or industry consortia). These could also be one of the “actor” groups in your matrix.
Weekly Assignment
Reflecting on what you learned and did in class this week, outline any ethical concerns that arose, especially any that were new to you. Then propose any governance actions you think might be appropriate to address those issues. This should be included on your class page for this week.
Final Project Assignment
As part of your final project, design one or more strategies to ensure that your project, and what it enables, contributes to growing an ethical biological future.
Questions?
For MIT or Harvard students: htgaa2026-TAs@media.mit.edu For Global students: htgaa2026-globalTAs@media.mit.edu
Before Next Class
- Open a Personal Notion Page (as covered in Recitation) and submit public link to your notion page to this Google Form.
- Complete the Principles and Practices Assignment (as shown above)
Specifically for In-Person Students at MIT/Harvard
- Lab Training (Failure to do so will jeopardize your acceptance)
- Complete Lab Specific Training in Person.
- Complete Safety Training in Atlas
- Navigate to atlas.mit.edu and on the right-hand side, click “Learning Center”
- Head to the Course Catalog and find the following two courses:
- General Biosafety for Researchers (EHS00260w)
- Managing Hazardous Waste (EHS00501w)
Reading & Resources
Lab-specific
Governance & ethics
- Protein Design Meets Biosecurity: A 2024 Science editorial by George Church and David Baker
- Synthetic Genomics: Options for Governance This is an older but useful report for thinking about a variety of options for the governance of biotechnology that inspired this week’s homework
- US Presidential Commission on the Study of Bioethical Issues Report: “New Directions: The Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies” This report considers the ethics of biotechnology and other emerging technologies
- Global guidance framework for the responsible use of the life sciences: “Mitigating biorisks and governing dual-use research” This World Health Organization report was issued after working groups from 2020-2022 and engendered much debate
- Bold Goals for U.S. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing: “Harnessing Research and Development to Further Societal Goals” This 2023 report from the U.S. White House was generated as the result of an Executive Order
- National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology: This U.S. Congressional Commission will produce its first “comprehensive” report at the end of 2024 but has an “interim” 2023 report posted now, and they are currently soliciting input to guide national policy regulating biotech
- iGEM 2020 Safety Hub: This page includes links to many useful resources including the WHO biosafety manual, the NIH guidelines and the CDC Biosafety in Microbial and Biomedical Laboratories Guide; additional information is available on the iGEM 2023 Responsibility page
- Handbook for Community Biology Spaces: A handbook co-developed by community biolobabs, designed as a living document that can be updated and expanded by the community over time
- DIYBio Ask a biosafety expert This page includes a portal where you can get your biosafety questions answered by professionals
- Synopsis of Biological Safety and Security Arrangements (Gronvall & Rozo, 2015): This report describes biosafety and biosecurity rules and regulations in many countries
- Rooftop Solar and the Four Levers of Social Change: A blog post from Ethan Zuckerman considering different types of ways of regulating behavior, adopted in part from Lawrence Lessig’s book: Code 2.0, and explored in the context of energy consumption and production