๐งฌ Week 1: Principles & Practices
๐ Biological Engineering Project
Genetically waterproof mycelium surfboards from olive waste.
Prior research: Polyester/pine resin coatings (6-12 months)
HTGAA innovation: CRISPR hydrophobins โ permanent waterproofing
๐ Governance Table
| Criteria | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biosecurity | โ | โ | โ |
| Lab Safety | โ | โ | โ |
| Environment | โ | โ | โ |
Governance Options
Option 1: Regulatory Notification Requirement
Purpose: Currently no specific EU regulation targets mycelium GMM composites for consumer products. Propose mandatory notification to national authority (Hellenic Ministry of Rural Development) before production begins. Design: Manufacturer submits safety dossier; authority reviews within 90 days. Assumptions: Assumes regulatory capacity exists; may underestimate review backlog. Risks: Overregulation could stifle innovation; under-review could miss risks.
Option 2: Open-Source Safety Certification Incentive
Purpose: Incentivize producers to publish biosafety protocols openly in exchange for fast-track certification and reduced liability. Design: EU-funded certification body reviews open-source designs; certified producers get market access priority. Assumptions: Assumes industry willing to share IP; assumes certification body can be funded. Risks: IP concerns may limit participation; certification quality may vary.
Option 3: Technical Containment Standard
Purpose: Require validated thermal inactivation (โฅ60ยฐC/48h) as a technical standard for all mycelium GMM products before market release. Design: ISO-style standard developed with industry; enforced via product testing. Assumptions: Assumes thermal inactivation is universally applicable. Risks: Some products may require different inactivation methods not covered.
Scoring Table
| Does the option: | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enhance Biosecurity | |||
| โข By preventing incidents | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| โข By helping respond | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Foster Lab Safety | |||
| โข By preventing incident | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| โข By helping respond | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Protect the environment | |||
| โข By preventing incidents | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| โข By helping respond | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Other considerations | |||
| โข Minimizing costs/burdens | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| โข Feasibility | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| โข Not impede research | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| โข Promote constructive applications | 2 | 1 | 2 |
1 = best, 2 = moderate, 3 = poor
Recommended Governance Approach
A combination of Option 1 + Option 3 is recommended. Mandatory notification ensures regulatory oversight without excessive burden, while a technical thermal inactivation standard provides a clear, measurable safety requirement applicable to all mycelium GMM products.
Audience: Hellenic Ministry of Rural Development and Food + EU Commission DG Health and Food Safety.
Trade-offs: Option 2 (open-source incentive) is desirable long-term but requires industry buy-in that may not exist at early stages. Option 1+3 can be implemented immediately with existing regulatory frameworks.
Uncertainties: Thermal inactivation standards need validation across different mycelium composite formulations.
Ethical Concerns from Week 1
The pipetting lab raised awareness of how even basic lab work requires careful attention to precision and contamination control.
Key ethical concerns for the mycelium surfboard project:
- Environmental release: Engineered G. lucidum must never be released into natural environments โ containment protocols are essential.
- Skin safety: Hydrophobin SC16 coating on a consumer product requires toxicological testing before market release.
- Equity: Advanced biotechnology should not remain exclusive to well-funded labs โ open-source protocols can democratize access.
Governance action proposed: Establish a community biolab safety protocol for mycelium composite GMM work, modeled on iGEM biosafety guidelines, accessible to all nodes globally.
Week 2 Lecture Prep
Professor Jacobson Questions
1. Error rate of DNA polymerase vs human genome: DNA polymerase has an error rate of ~1 in 10โท bases. The human genome is ~3ร10โน base pairs, meaning ~300 errors per replication cycle. Biology addresses this through proofreading (3’โ5’ exonuclease activity) and mismatch repair systems, reducing effective error rate to ~1 in 10ยนโฐ.
2. Ways to code for an average human protein: An average protein of 300 amino acids could be encoded by ~3ร10ยนโดโธ different DNA sequences (since most amino acids have 2-6 codons). In practice, codon bias (organism-specific preferred codons), RNA secondary structure, and ribosome binding efficiency mean most sequences don’t work equally well.
Dr. LeProust Questions
1. Most commonly used method for oligo synthesis: Phosphoramidite chemistry โ sequential addition of protected nucleotides on a solid support, with ~98-99% coupling efficiency per step.
2. Why difficult to make oligos >200nt: Each synthesis step is ~99% efficient. For a 200nt oligo: 0.99ยฒโฐโฐ = ~13% full-length product. At 300nt: ~5%. Errors accumulate multiplicatively, making longer sequences increasingly impure and costly.
3. Why can’t you make a 2000bp gene via direct oligo synthesis: A 2000bp gene would require ~0.99ยฒโฐโฐโฐ = ~2ร10โปโน yield โ essentially nothing. Instead, shorter overlapping oligos (~60nt) are synthesized and assembled via PCR or ligation into longer genes.
Professor Church Question
Selected: What are the 10 essential amino acids and the Lysine Contingency?
The 10 essential amino acids (cannot be synthesized by humans) are: Histidine, Isoleucine, Leucine, Lysine, Methionine, Phenylalanine, Threonine, Tryptophan, Valine, and Phenylalanine.
The “Lysine Contingency” refers to the idea that if organisms lost the ability to synthesize Lysine, they would become dependent on dietary sources โ creating a vulnerability. This has implications for biosecurity (engineered auxotrophs as containment), agriculture (Lysine-enriched crops), and synthetic biology (orthogonal organisms dependent on non-natural amino acids).