Subsections of <YOUR NAME HERE> — HTGAA Spring 2026
Homework
Weekly homework submissions:
Week 1 HW: Principles and Practices
A synthetic biology platform that programs mushroom mycelium as a controllable biofactory to produce tunable, nano-engineered chitin–β-glucan polymers for regenerative packaging and materials. Biological engineering application I want to develop I want to develop a synthetic biology–enabled fungal biomanufacturing platform, inspired directly by my work with Nanoshroom, that engineers mushrooms not just as a growth substrate but as programmable biological factories. The application focuses on producing standardized, high-performance chitin–β-glucan polymers that can replace petroleum plastics and forest-derived materials in packaging and other material systems.
Subsections of Homework
Week 1 HW: Principles and Practices
A synthetic biology platform that programs mushroom mycelium as a controllable biofactory to produce tunable, nano-engineered chitin–β-glucan polymers for regenerative packaging and materials.
Biological engineering application I want to develop
I want to develop a synthetic biology–enabled fungal biomanufacturing platform, inspired directly by my work with Nanoshroom, that engineers mushrooms not just as a growth substrate but as programmable biological factories. The application focuses on producing standardized, high-performance chitin–β-glucan polymers that can replace petroleum plastics and forest-derived materials in packaging and other material systems.
At its core, this platform integrates fungal cultivation, metabolic pathway tuning, and green polymer extraction to precisely control polymer composition, molecular weight, and nanostructure. Instead of treating mycelium as a bulk material grown into shapes, this approach operates at the molecular and nanoscale, where material properties such as tensile strength, flexibility, barrier performance, and biodegradation rate can be engineered through biological parameters rather than chemical additives.
Why this application matters
Current sustainable material alternatives face clear limitations. Conventional bioplastics rely on agricultural feedstocks, compete with food systems, and often underperform or require industrial composting. Existing mycelium materials, while promising, lack repeatability, material standardization, and tunability, which prevents them from scaling into mainstream manufacturing.
This biological engineering application addresses those gaps by:
- Decoupling material performance from petrochemistry, using fungal metabolism as the design space
- Enabling forest-free, low-energy polymer production
- Supporting decentralized manufacturing, where local waste streams feed regional bioproduction units
- Aligning material design with circular bioeconomy principles, where materials safely return to biological cycles
From a synthetic biology perspective, the system reframes material production as a biological programming problem: how growth conditions, nutrient inputs, and extraction protocols influence polymer architecture and downstream performance.
Personal and research motivation
This application sits at the intersection of my background in biodesign, materials science, and fungal biotechnology. Through Nanoshroom, I am already developing proof-of-concept mushroom-based packaging materials, and this proposed tool formalizes that work into a scalable synthetic biology framework. It allows me to ask deeper research questions around biological control, standardization, and system design—while remaining tightly connected to real-world deployment and climate impact.
Ultimately, this application is about redefining materials not as inert products, but as engineered biological systems—grown, programmed, and returned to nature with intention.
| Does the option: | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enhance Biosecurity | |||
| • By preventing incidents | |||
| • By helping respond | |||
| Foster Lab Safety | |||
| • By preventing incident | |||
| • By helping respond | |||
| Protect the environment | |||
| • By preventing incidents | |||
| • By helping respond | |||
| Other considerations | |||
| • Minimizing costs and burdens to stakeholders | |||
| • Feasibility? | |||
| • Not impede research | |||
| • Promote constructive applications |