Week 1 HW: Principles and Practices

source: wikimedia commons

Genetically Engineered Diatoms to Bind with Building Rubble/Waste

Building materials like cement and brick are difficult to reuse and natural weathering or active demolition leaves behind tons of waste material that remains under-recycled. In a previous project my team from graduate school developed a porous, bio receptive glass using glass waste and I would like to expand upon that research by bioengineering diatoms into a silica scaffold of cement and glass rubble/frits to fuse these waste materials into a new architectural material. Diatoms are an exciting prospect for architecture for their silica frustules, inherent translucency, and their lacy pore structure. I am curious to see if there would be a way to pattern their silica deposits for enhanced carbon sink and particle processing in urban spaces. It would also be beautiful to see the formation of silica deposits depending on sun patterns on site, filling in the rubble scaffold where there is more direct light. It would also be interesting to potentially engineer the directional strength of a diatom-rubble piece and the lace pattern, playing with the idea of directional bias in architecture more theoretically but also for building methods.

Goals:

• When speculating such panels, it is important to keep policy which mitigates the impact of the material creation and installation on the surrounding soil and water biodiversity through run off material and resources used to grow the diatom structures. Diatoms can overpower other microorganisms and limits on the volume of diatom production could help reduce the chances of local ecological harm and biological impact.

• Another goal is to secure a non-stress inducing method of cultivating and sourcing the diatoms for this scale of application.

• This material should be lessening the burden of the construction industry.

Concerns:

• Who would have access to this material?

• How does this material impact the local environment?

• Will users receive this material positively and use it? Or will it be demolished or underutilized?

• Will this create excess burden on access to an organism for this scale? What are the political realities of sourcing this material?

• How do diatoms react with materials like cement, brick, and glass? Are there any reactions between materials that can cause issues?

Actions:

• When casting the rubble diatom mixture, create reusable casts/equipment workflows when possible.

• Work directly with ecologists to determine the site for harvesting and to determine if the site for installation is appropriate in case of run-off or other biological interactions.

• One method of mitigating the environmental impact of sourcing and using diatoms at this large scale could be to focus on cultivation from local areas with diatom overgrowth so that this helps cut down on the environmental impact of current unhealthy ecology.

• Lab testing, especially longevity testing, would help clear up uncertainty regarding the impact of the material on site as it weathers and does through periods of high and low growth. This includes the potential toxicity of the rubble, the biological interactions of the diatoms, and how the ,odified diatoms may change over time through mutations and biomass buildup.

• Community workshops/exhibits as user studies to understand how people would interact with the material (biosecurity of sensory interaction), understand whether they would accept it in their built environment, and educate them on the material itself.